DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Print Design

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2007, 12:31 PM   #1
melaroonie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Default FrameMaker Cross Platform Question

Hello -
I am currently working on converting a technical manual from FrameMaker 6.0 on a UNIX platform to FrameMaker 7.2 on a Windows machine. I haven't encountered any problems with the text portions of the book, but the graphics are another story! The figures were created using CorelDRAW 12 and were exported as .eps for the original book, but the quality of the figures is severely degraded on the PC. I have tried other formats (.jpg, .gif, .wmf, .tif, and even .png), but to no avail. The manual is distributed in both print and PDF format. The PDF displays well on the screen, but I would really like to see better quality in the FM working files.

I came across a thread from last summer dealing with a similar issue - importing Corel files into FrameMaker, but using an .eps format did not solve my problem.

Any help would be greatly appreciated - thanks!
melaroonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 01:28 PM   #2
roaryg
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 176
Default

If you create a new blank document on windows, and place one of the .eps on the page, how does this print? If its ok, then the graphics are ok, and it is some kind of conversion problem. And I'm sure you know .eps have to be printed onto a postscript printer?

   
__________________
Tim.
roaryg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 06:03 PM   #3
Howard Allen
Member
 
Howard Allen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 824
Default

I don't use FrameMaker or CorelDraw (or Windows), so I will defer to more savvy opinions, but if I understand your problem, your images look terrible onscreen in FrameMaker, but render OK in PDF format--correct?

I believe that .eps graphics are saved with a low-resolution (i.e. 72 ppi) placeholder image, which is what gets displayed onscreen. In other words, it will look really bad onscreen, but if you print to paper or PDF, the PostScript code will be rendered correctly. The same thing applies in other DTP applications, like InDesign, which places low-resolution onscreen placeholders for bitmap images as well. If your .eps images print OK and look OK on PDFs, then I don't think you have anything to worry about. It's just the nature of the beast, and something you have to get used to.
Howard Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 05:31 AM   #4
dogmandouglas
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Default

Quite a few DTP applications had the same issue, low res preview but high res print out. Quark addressed the problem by allowing you either a high res preview or low res preview.

The low res image was used of course when computers didn't have that much memory and the processors were too slow to display high res in real time, but this is not so much of a problem these days.

It's hard to think that not so long ago, that using Compugraphic DTP typesetting equipment I had to type in code for fonts, on a green screen – leave space for pictures to be inserted later, and didn't see what the page looked like until I either previewed it on a separate monitor or sent it to bromide.
dogmandouglas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 10:33 AM   #5
melaroonie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Default

I tried printing a new document with an .eps graphic - no change. I'll continue to try some different import options to see if I can get the best combination. Yes, we have postscript printers, so that is covered.

Thanks for your reply, Tim.
melaroonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 12:15 PM   #6
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,650
Default

>> The figures were created using CorelDRAW 12 and were exported as .eps for the original book, but the quality of the figures is severely degraded on the PC.

Degraded where? On the screen or when printing them to a PS printer? You don't see the actual EPS on screen, just a preview of it, which may have been created at fairly low resolution, so it might well look nasty on screen. Unlike many apps, Draw can export EPS with a WMF preview; you might try a few of those. I don't know whether FrameMaker handles them correctly; not all apps do. It's worth a try.

There's a service pack for Draw 12 that has something specific to do with EPS. Whether import or export, I don't recall, but it might be worth looking that up.

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting annoyed with cross-browser CSS jwoolf09 Web Design 19 10-16-2007 08:36 AM
Cross References for InDesign CS Dave Saunders Print Production & Automation 9 07-04-2006 10:31 AM
Font name cross references Norbert Fonts & Typography 5 12-14-2005 08:15 PM
Most common browser fonts by platform ktinkel Web Site Building & Maintenance 10 09-02-2005 06:56 AM
[PR] PageStream: Multi-platform DTP s/w ktinkel Print Design 0 05-01-2005 08:23 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2019 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.