DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2007, 06:57 AM   #1
RJ Emery
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 264
Default Alternatives to MS Publisher

What commercially available DTP programs exist that would be as good if not better than MS Publisher?

   
__________________
RJ Emery, Eastern USA
WordPerfect X3 on W10 x64
RJ Emery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 09:06 AM   #2
ktinkel
Founding Sysop
 
ktinkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Connecticut, on the Housatonic River near its mouth at Long Island Sound.
Posts: 11,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ Emery View Post
What commercially available DTP programs exist that would be as good if not better than MS Publisher?
What sort of material do you intend to produce? How will it be printed — on your desktop printer, or by a commercial ink-on-paper printer? Will you need to exchange files with others?

So far as I know there is no DTP program that is weaker or less capable than MS Publisher.

The high-end software — used to produce newspapers, magazines, and books — is extremely capable, and expensive. It may be more than you need. This category includes Adobe InDesign and PageMaker (now virtually obsolete) as well as QuarkXPress. These are expensive and you may not need all their power.

Other packages that might work:

Serif PagePlus is a popular step up from MS Publisher. It has ardent fans, a few of which visit here at least occasionally.

Ventura Publisher (now called Corel Ventura 10) has always been a favorite with users, and it is very capable, once competitive with PageMaker. Then it went through changes of ownership and lost steam. But I still know people who swear by it.

PageStream 5.0 started out on Atari, then came out with a Mac version, and today is also available for Windows and Linux. It is a very capable program, at a fairly small price.

The open source program Scribus is gaining interest, and we have a couple of users here on the forum.

There are a few others, but that list should get you started. If you answer those questions I posed at the beginning of this message, we may be able to give you more focused advice.

   
__________________
[SIZE=2][COLOR=LemonChiffon]::[/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ktinkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 10:04 AM   #3
George
Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktinkel View Post
Other packages that might work:
Have you ever compared the type appearance between these programs -- I mean like letter spacing. Are there significant differences??

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktinkel View Post
PageStream 5.0 ...is a very capable program, at a fairly small price.
Did you ever compare the basic program to the professional to note the advantages??

George
George is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 10:26 AM   #4
ktinkel
Founding Sysop
 
ktinkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Connecticut, on the Housatonic River near its mouth at Long Island Sound.
Posts: 11,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
Have you ever compared the type appearance between these programs -- I mean like letter spacing. Are there significant differences??
If you use a well-spaced font and avoid justification, all should do. It is when you need to finesse the spacing that the strength of the high-end packages shows up.

I know PageMaker, InDesign, and XPress fairly well. I have reviewed PageStream, once, probably a decade ago. I thought it was pretty good at the time, even compared to the better-known programs, but there was no professional version and it was a long time ago.

PagePlus and Ventura do not run on Macs, so while I have certainly seen output from them (particularly Ventura), I have little idea of how easy it was to set good type.

I keep meaning to check out Scribus, but haven’t had the time. Howard White and a few others here use it, and would be better people to ask about typographic quality.

Or maybe we could get people to make controlled specimen paragraphs in all these programs so we could get printable PDFs for comparison purposes. No special settings, just flush left/rag right and justified samples using the programs’ default settings.

   
__________________
[SIZE=2][COLOR=LemonChiffon]::[/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ktinkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 12:01 PM   #5
RJ Emery
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 264
Default

Kathleen,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktinkel View Post
What sort of material do you intend to produce?
Principal uses would be to produce:

1) half-page or full-page flyers and,
2) two- to four-page newsletters.

Possible other uses might include small book publishing where the material would be technical (to include equations).

Quote:
How will it be printed — on your desktop printer, or by a commercial ink-on-paper printer?
Most often on a desktop printer. Some work might be sent to either a copy center or a commercial printer.

Quote:
Will you need to exchange files with others?
More likely I will be sent files for work. Therefore, the DTP program should be capable of importing/exporting to MS Publisher.

The ability to publish to PDF is important. In many cases, only a PDF will be exchanged.

Can Adobe Acrobat import/export PUB files?

However, for my own work needs, I don't need to save efforts in PUB format.

Quote:
So far as I know there is no DTP program that is weaker or less capable than MS Publisher.
That's good to know.

Quote:
The high-end software — used to produce newspapers, magazines, and books — is extremely capable, and expensive. It may be more than you need. This category includes Adobe InDesign and PageMaker (now virtually obsolete) as well as QuarkXPress. These are expensive and you may not need all their power.
I probably don't. I can acquire that software if ever faced with producing a 1,000 page book. I don't feel I would be doing newspaper mock ups.


Quote:
The open source program Scribus is gaining interest, and we have a couple of users here on the forum.
I should have that program on my Linux SuSE system, but I don't think it imports/exports PUB files.

Quote:
If you answer those questions I posed at the beginning of this message, we may be able to give you more focused advice.
I have answered your questions and would appreciate any revised suggestions. Any software acquired is intended for either an XP or Linux SuSE system.

   
__________________
RJ Emery, Eastern USA
WordPerfect X3 on W10 x64
RJ Emery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 12:16 PM   #6
ktinkel
Founding Sysop
 
ktinkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Connecticut, on the Housatonic River near its mouth at Long Island Sound.
Posts: 11,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ Emery View Post
Can Adobe Acrobat import/export PUB files?
I doubt it can export an MS Publisher file. Acrobat can distill files from most modern apps, possibly including Publisher, to create a PDF. Someone else here probably knows all the ins and outs of that.

As far as the other DTP programs are concerned, it is possible (but I do not actually know) that Serif PagePlus might be able to open an MS Publisher file; seems less likely that it could create a compatible file. But I don’t know.

At this point we need to hear from PC users of some of these programs — they could check to see if any do what you want.

   
__________________
[SIZE=2][COLOR=LemonChiffon]::[/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ktinkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 02:33 PM   #7
George
Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktinkel View Post
I
Or maybe we could get people to make controlled specimen paragraphs in all these programs so we could get printable PDFs for comparison purposes.
You mean PDFs made by the programs themselves -- thus retaining their WP type quality??? Or PDFs made by another program, like Adobe Acrobat or Scan Soft?? I thought if I convert a file to PDF in AA, that software controls type quality, converting it to its specifications. Or would AA or SS just retain the type quality as produced by the WP program -- thus, producing one level of quality in, say, MS Word, and another in InDesign??

George
George is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 02:55 PM   #8
RJ Emery
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 264
Default

George,

I am always interested in learning new things.

What is ScanSoft and how does it relate to this thread or what Kathleen proposed?

   
__________________
RJ Emery, Eastern USA
WordPerfect X3 on W10 x64
RJ Emery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 06:39 PM   #9
George
Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ Emery View Post
What is ScanSoft and how does it relate to this thread or what Kathleen proposed?
RJ,

I'm not a real desktop publisher, but I get by nicely for my own purposes, which is a lot of desktop publishing. There are different ways to make PDFs, and lately I've been using this program made by Scan Soft. It doesn't cost much, and it's easy to use, and it makes nice documents -- far as I can tell.

One thing that really irritates me about Adobe products is, that I can never buy them (legally) for just a fraction of their retail cost. I don't get it -- I buy absolutely all my other software that way. Sometimes if I pay market rates for things, I end up getting real confused. I'm not sure why, but part of it is like things I experienced as a child.

KT suggested we make a sample paragraph in different DTP programs to compare type quality using a PDF format. So that's how my questions arose in the thread.

Don't worry, it all makes sense after awhile. Trust me, it does.

George
George is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 08:43 PM   #10
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,714
Default

If work files will be in Pub format, why not use Publisher?

If you already have it, that is. If so, is there some reason not to continue using it?

If you don't have it, is there some reason it's off your list of programs to consider purchasing? It may not be the hottest thing on the block, but it most probably reads Pub files flawlessly, gotta give it that at least. ;-)

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Curious Publisher?? George General Publishing Topics 0 07-13-2007 06:11 AM
Alternatives to Arial & Times New Roman RJ Emery Fonts & Typography 20 07-03-2006 06:06 PM
Alternatives to Acrobat? dthomsen8 Print Production & Automation 12 12-22-2005 05:45 PM
Alternatives to ACDSee RJ Emery Software 1 03-14-2005 05:46 PM
Fax alternatives Steve Rindsberg Business Matters 22 03-11-2005 10:34 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2019 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.