|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 65
|
![]()
Help needed, please:
I'm working on a website for a friend's small business. I'm also using it as a self-training exercise. I want it to be a nice website using as much nifty stuff (CSS2, a bit of Javascript, absolute and relative positioning, layers, tab-buttons, that sort of thing) as I can manage, but I want to minimize any risk of using features that common browsers won't be able to recognize and render correctly. So I'm wondering what level of nifty stuff I can safely use. I already know that Firefox 1.5 and MSIE 6 don't always render CSS-formatted pages the same way, which is a friggin' nuisance. A check of my own website's user logs shows that for this year, about 88% of the non-bot hits have come from browsers that should be CSS2 compliant: Firefox, IE6, IE5, Mozilla 5. IE6 accounts for 71% of all visitors, all by itself. The two names in the top ten list that concern me are Safari (no version information given) and Opera 8.5. I know nothing about either one. How reliably CSS-compliant are they? What level of browser do you folks design for? How often do you get user complaints about browsers that don't render CSS websites correctly? -- JSW |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Designing with web standards | ktinkel | Web Design | 38 | 10-18-2006 07:27 AM |
Browser choice? | m_chanoine | Web Design | 22 | 09-25-2006 06:58 AM |
Designing around substandard photographs | tflavin | Print Design | 12 | 08-26-2006 12:45 PM |
Yet another Mac OS X browser! | ktinkel | General Publishing Topics | 9 | 01-27-2006 05:50 AM |
Sumner Stone on designing type | ktinkel | Fonts & Typography | 8 | 05-16-2005 05:00 AM |