Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web

Ronald · 07-10-2011, 09:36 AM

My brother and I are secretly working on a documentary project about my grandparents' lives and the general family. The other night, we researched the best way to scan old photos which, for us, has 3 purposes: digital archiving, printing, and video (documentary).

We scanned one photo (a 3.5x5 I believe) at 300, 600, and 1200 dpi, put all three versions on an SD card, viewed them on a flatscreen TV, and decided 600 dpi seemed to have the best screen quality, though not by much. We'd like to slowly pan and zoom on photos as you'd see in a documentary.

So at this point, I'm hoping that scanning at 600 dip in TIFF format is the best method for all 3 purposes. I haven't printed high quality versions of the scans but I would hope there wouldn't be a big difference between 300 and 600 (I read that basic old photos should be 300 dpi and nice portraits should be 600 dpi, and that too high a dpi can be bad for small photos). For format purposes, any photos we want to use in the documentary can be saved as JPEGs if needed.

Does this sound good? I'd hate to have to scan them twice.

annc · 07-10-2011, 11:09 AM

It sounds like a good plan to me, Ronald. 600ppi TIFFs at the original photo size are the standard required for the state and national photo archives.

terrie · 07-10-2011, 12:00 PM

Quote:

ronald: Does this sound good? I'd hate to have to scan them twice.

I think 600dpi is very reasonable That's the ppi/dpi I use to scan old photos because it gives me flexibility in final sizing when I finish any clean-up and exposure corrections. Once clean-up/corrections are done, I resize the width/height dimentions and set ppi/dpi to 300ppi/dpi for printing...

Terrie

Ronald · 07-10-2011, 11:29 PM

Thank you, annc and terrie. Good to know I was on the mark.

Well, Grandpa finally died today (Sunday). He was in the final stages for the last few days, bedridden without fluids or food and unable to communicate. I wrote his obituary with some help from Grandma. My brother and I hope to spend a whole day scanning their many photos soon. The documentary will be a fine tribute to both of them when she leaves us too.

terrie · 07-11-2011, 10:48 AM

So very sorry to hear about your grandfather...

Terrie

BobRoosth · 07-12-2011, 07:49 PM

The only reason to scan at 1200 or higher would be for the purposes of major enlargement. 600 allows easy printing at 7x10 (2x original). Higher sometimes allows one to clean up artifacts that are blurry at lower rez.

A great book someone on this forum one recommended: Digital Restoration from Start to Finish, by Ctein, pub. by Focal Press.

Ronald · 08-07-2011, 05:47 PM

Thank you, Bob. I'll look into that book.

07-10-2011, 09:36 AM	#1
Ronald Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Great Plains, USA Posts: 286	Scanning Old Photos for Print & Video My brother and I are secretly working on a documentary project about my grandparents' lives and the general family. The other night, we researched the best way to scan old photos which, for us, has 3 purposes: digital archiving, printing, and video (documentary). We scanned one photo (a 3.5x5 I believe) at 300, 600, and 1200 dpi, put all three versions on an SD card, viewed them on a flatscreen TV, and decided 600 dpi seemed to have the best screen quality, though not by much. We'd like to slowly pan and zoom on photos as you'd see in a documentary. So at this point, I'm hoping that scanning at 600 dip in TIFF format is the best method for all 3 purposes. I haven't printed high quality versions of the scans but I would hope there wouldn't be a big difference between 300 and 600 (I read that basic old photos should be 300 dpi and nice portraits should be 600 dpi, and that too high a dpi can be bad for small photos). For format purposes, any photos we want to use in the documentary can be saved as JPEGs if needed. Does this sound good? I'd hate to have to scan them twice.

07-10-2011, 11:09 AM	#2
annc Sysop Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Subtropical Queensland, Australia, between the mountains and the Coral Sea Posts: 4,592	It sounds like a good plan to me, Ronald. 600ppi TIFFs at the original photo size are the standard required for the state and national photo archives. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Try this for video+music	Richard Waller	The Corner Pub	1	09-27-2009 08:03 AM
TXT ISLAND (video)	ktinkel	Fonts & Typography	2	06-05-2009 11:13 AM
Help stamp out video	Richard Waller	Photography	14	11-12-2008 09:19 PM
Where to put my photos	Mike	Images	4	05-28-2007 11:27 PM
Video Format for Web	CherylJohnson	Web Design	8	05-31-2006 06:02 PM

07-10-2011, 11:29 PM	#4
Ronald Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Great Plains, USA Posts: 286	Thank you, annc and terrie. Good to know I was on the mark. Well, Grandpa finally died today (Sunday). He was in the final stages for the last few days, bedridden without fluids or food and unable to communicate. I wrote his obituary with some help from Grandma. My brother and I hope to spend a whole day scanning their many photos soon. The documentary will be a fine tribute to both of them when she leaves us too.

07-11-2011, 10:48 AM	#5
terrie Sysop Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 10,478	So very sorry to hear about your grandfather... Terrie

07-12-2011, 07:49 PM	#6
BobRoosth Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles, Ca. Posts: 942	The only reason to scan at 1200 or higher would be for the purposes of major enlargement. 600 allows easy printing at 7x10 (2x original). Higher sometimes allows one to clean up artifacts that are blurry at lower rez. A great book someone on this forum one recommended: Digital Restoration from Start to Finish, by Ctein, pub. by Focal Press.

08-07-2011, 05:47 PM	#7
Ronald Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Great Plains, USA Posts: 286	Thank you, Bob. I'll look into that book.